Am I the only one who assumed someone was actually checking the chemicals in our food?
I read that the FDA wants to widen a loophole so certain chemicals can go into food without a full safety review. I am not a chemist and I am not pretending to be one. I just thought the entire job of a food regulator was the reviewing part. If the only firm line is cancer and everything else gets a pass, then the standard is not safety, it is plausible deniability. Please tell me I have this wrong, because I would genuinely love to be wrong here.