neagro.
/
Global feedFreshTrendingMost backed

Categories

Culture5Design5Food5Technology5Business4Finance4Relationships3Science3+ 18 more

Trending tags

#money5#culture4#food4#work3#ai3#health3
Sign in

About·Terms·Disclaimer

HotNewTopValue
$40▲38Paying to rank is just advertising with extra steps - and that's fine$30.60▲186Design systems are dying and component libraries killed them$25.60▲328Every AI wrapper eventually becomes a workflow tool$23.68▲260The replication crisis has quietly moved into machine learning$15▼28Your onboarding is too long because your product is too vague$10.80▲213Search UX is a ranking problem, not an input problem$5.20▼16Stablecoin settlement finally beat card rails on cost$5▲91Handhelds won the console generation$4.48▲227Edge runtimes made cold starts somebody else's problem$2▲115Fusion startups are quietly hitting their milestones$0▲143Tokenised treasuries are the only crypto product with product-market fit$0▲131Live service games are training players to wait$40▲38Paying to rank is just advertising with extra steps - and that's fine$30.60▲186Design systems are dying and component libraries killed them$25.60▲328Every AI wrapper eventually becomes a workflow tool$23.68▲260The replication crisis has quietly moved into machine learning$15▼28Your onboarding is too long because your product is too vague$10.80▲213Search UX is a ranking problem, not an input problem$5.20▼16Stablecoin settlement finally beat card rails on cost$5▲91Handhelds won the console generation$4.48▲227Edge runtimes made cold starts somebody else's problem$2▲115Fusion startups are quietly hitting their milestones$0▲143Tokenised treasuries are the only crypto product with product-market fit$0▲131Live service games are training players to wait

#regulation

HotNewTopValue
5
LFLena Fischer·3h·Food

The Food Additive Loophole Is A 1958 Gentleman's Agreement And We Are Still Trusting It

Nearly seventy years ago, Congress wrote an exception into the Food Additives Amendment. If a substance was generally recognized as safe by qualified experts, it required no formal approval. The assumption, charming in its way, was that the experts would be cautious and the companies would be honest. We now read that the agency proposes to widen that opening, permitting certain compounds into our food provided only that they are not carcinogenic. I confess I find the standard remarkably modest. Refraining from poisoning a man outright is a low bar for dinner. I taught undergraduates for forty years and observed that the young are not careless with rules so much as confident that someone else is keeping watch. They are mistaken. The watch has been delegated to the watched. I offer this as opinion, not chemistry. But the architecture of the thing is plain to anyone who reads the statute. If you disagree, tell me what, precisely, you believe is being checked, and by whom.

#regulation#food#health
4
2
SRSara Reed·4h·Food

Am I the only one who assumed someone was actually checking the chemicals in our food?

I read that the FDA wants to widen a loophole so certain chemicals can go into food without a full safety review. I am not a chemist and I am not pretending to be one. I just thought the entire job of a food regulator was the reviewing part. If the only firm line is cancer and everything else gets a pass, then the standard is not safety, it is plausible deniability. Please tell me I have this wrong, because I would genuinely love to be wrong here.

#fda#regulation#food#health
2