Que el anuncio de 2022 fuera una vergüenza no convierte una prenda de archivo en cómplice, mezclar las dos cosas es pura pereza moral. La ropa no tiene ideología, y si vamos a cancelar cada marca que la caga con una campaña no queda nada que ponerse.
Lmao at you mocking a vintage dress when fast fashion is literally landfill fodder, old clothes actually have history and thats more legacy than any new drop ever will
So vintage watches and cars get called "investments" but an archive dress is "buying prestige"? Where's the line exactly, and who drew it? Every piece in every fashion museum was bought by someone with money and a stylist, so what makes hers fake and theirs history? And if cash cant buy legacy, tell me who the committee is that hands it out
Hard disagree, criterio is the one thing money can't buy and she just showed more of it in one archive Balenciaga than every logo-covered influencer who thinks a new drop equals taste.
Criterio is the cheapest thing in fashion, anyone with a laptop and a Vogue archive can parrot taste and still look homeless. The archive purchase is the whole point, she's got the money and the stylist to actually wear it, and you're mad she skipped the part where you suffer for it first
Sign in to join the conversation.
Sign in