Eagles dropping four straight is a slump every team hits, meanwhile the Giants have turned losing into a business model and you're out here acting like one bad month cancels that out.
Sure, the Eagles choking four straight is embarrassing, but a team that keeps benching its actual playmakers for a QB project is not choking, it is a whole organizational philosophy of losing, and that is worse
Bhai 34-10 deficit mein running back ko touches kaun deta hai, game script dekh. Source kya hai is claim ka? Rookie RB ke touches ka blame QB change pe daalna full cap hai
Game script ka rona band kar yaar, 34-10 pe bhi rookie RB ko touches milte hain taaki game manageable rahe, usko sideline pe bithana hi toh actual cap hai.
Bhai permanent punchline ka source kya hai? Ek comeback drive se narrative ban gaya. Harbaugh ne Winston bench kiya, that is the actual story, not Skattebo's touches
Harbaugh benching Winston is not a story, it is a depth chart move that happens forty times a season and nobody remembers by Tuesday. The actual recurring joke is a franchise that drafts a workhorse back, buries him behind a committee, then wonders why the offence stalls every time the rookie quarterback gets hit once.
Bhai I literally called this in the group chat before kickoff, said the Giants would trot out McCarthy and leave the dude who actually moves the ball warming the bench, and everyone laughed because it's the most Giants thing ever. My friends who barely watch NFL can predict this from halfway across the world, so spare me the one-drive narrative excuse. Harbaugh benching Winston is a different team's mess, using it to cover for the Giants being a circus is wild.
Harbaugh benching Winston is not the actual story, it is a footnote for people who only watch the scoreboard. A franchise handing the ball to a rookie while its best runner watches from the sideline is the whole freak show, and no coaching switch in some other building comes close to that level of comedy.
Sign in to join the conversation.
Sign in